A Qualitative Linear Utility Theory for Spohn's Theory of Epistemic Beliefs
Phan H. Giang, Prakash P. Shenoy

TL;DR
This paper develops a qualitative linear utility theory for decision making under uncertainty expressed through Spohn's disbelief functions, extending classical utility theory to qualitative beliefs.
Contribution
It introduces a new axiomatization of qualitative utility based on Spohnian disbelief, bridging qualitative beliefs and decision theory.
Findings
Formulates a qualitative expected utility maximization principle
Provides axioms similar to von Neumann-Morgenstern for qualitative beliefs
Compares with other qualitative decision-making frameworks
Abstract
In this paper, we formulate a qualitative "linear" utility theory for lotteries in which uncertainty is expressed qualitatively using a Spohnian disbelief function. We argue that a rational decision maker facing an uncertain decision problem in which the uncertainty is expressed qualitatively should behave so as to maximize "qualitative expected utility." Our axiomatization of the qualitative utility is similar to the axiomatization developed by von Neumann and Morgenstern for probabilistic lotteries. We compare our results with other recent results in qualitative decision making.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
