Lagrangian concordance is not a symmetric relation
Baptiste Chantraine

TL;DR
This paper provides an explicit example demonstrating that Lagrangian concordance between Legendrian knots is not a symmetric relation, using contact homology and augmentation categories.
Contribution
It constructs a specific Legendrian knot with a one-way Lagrangian concordance, proving non-symmetry of the relation.
Findings
Lagrangian concordance from the trivial knot to a non-trivial knot exists.
No concordance exists in the reverse direction for the same pair.
The non-symmetry is established via Legendrian contact homology maps.
Abstract
We provide an explicit example of a non trivial Legendrian knot such that there exists a Lagrangian concordance from to where is the trivial Legendrian knot. We then use the map induced in Legendrian contact homology by a concordance and the augmentation category of to show that no Lagrangian concordance exists in the other direction. This proves that the relation of Lagrangian concordance is not symmetric.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
