How good is the Electricity benchmark for evaluating concept drift adaptation
Indre Zliobaite

TL;DR
This paper critiques the effectiveness of the Electricity benchmark in evaluating concept drift adaptation, highlighting issues with autocorrelated data that may lead to misleading accuracy improvements.
Contribution
It identifies a problem with using the Electricity benchmark for assessing adaptive classifiers on autocorrelated data, questioning its reliability.
Findings
Random change alarms can artificially inflate accuracy
Autocorrelation in data affects evaluation of adaptation methods
The benchmark may not accurately reflect true adaptation performance
Abstract
In this correspondence, we will point out a problem with testing adaptive classifiers on autocorrelated data. In such a case random change alarms may boost the accuracy figures. Hence, we cannot be sure if the adaptation is working well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Stream Mining Techniques · Smart Grid Energy Management · Caching and Content Delivery
