Comment on "Black Holes are Neither Particle Accelerators Nor Dark Matter Probes"
O. B. Zaslavskii

TL;DR
This paper clarifies misconceptions about the Banados-Silk-West effect, demonstrating that the energy at infinity of particles colliding near a black hole horizon does not necessarily vanish due to redshift.
Contribution
It refutes previous claims that the energy at infinity vanishes near the black hole horizon, providing a corrected analysis of the effect.
Findings
Energy at infinity can remain finite near the horizon
Redshift does not always lead to zero energy at infinity
The effect's implications for black hole physics are clarified
Abstract
The Banados-Silk-West effect consists in the possibility to get infinite energy in the centre of mass frame of two particles colliding near the black hole horizon. According to S. T. McWilliams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 011102, the energy at infinity of the outcome vanishes because of infinite redshift when the point of collision approaches the horizon. I show that this is not so.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
