On Bankruptcy Game Theoretic Interval Rules
Rodica Branzei, Marco Dall'Aglio, Stef H. Tijs

TL;DR
This paper extends classical cooperative bankruptcy division rules to the interval setting, addressing uncertainties in claims and estate amounts, and analyzes the challenges of incorporating estate uncertainty.
Contribution
It introduces interval-based bankruptcy division rules and characterizes their properties, extending classical results to uncertain claim and estate scenarios.
Findings
Extended classical bankruptcy rules to interval claims.
Characterized properties of interval division rules.
Identified challenges in modeling estate uncertainty.
Abstract
Interval bankruptcy problems arise in situations where an estate has to be liquidated among a fixed number of creditors and uncertainty about the amounts of the claims is modeled by intervals. We extend in the interval setting the classical results by Curiel, Maschler and Tijs (1987) that characterize division rules which correspond to solutions of the cooperative bankruptcy game. Finally, we analyze the difficulties with incorporating the uncertainty about the estate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
