Discovery potential of xenon-based neutrinoless double beta decay experiments in light of small angular scale CMB observations
J.J. Gomez-Cadenas, J. Martin-Albo, J. Mu\~noz Vidal, C. Pe\~na-Garay

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the discovery potential of xenon-based neutrinoless double beta decay experiments in light of recent cosmological data suggesting nonzero neutrino masses, highlighting their promising sensitivity and technological advantages.
Contribution
It demonstrates that current and next-generation xenon-based bb0nu experiments can significantly explore the parameter space for Majorana neutrino masses, especially with low backgrounds and high energy resolution.
Findings
Current experiments could observe bb0nu events with 100 kg scale.
Next-generation 10-ton experiments can fully explore the allowed mass range.
Xenon technologies offer low backgrounds and excellent energy resolution.
Abstract
The South Pole Telescope (SPT) has probed an expanded angular range of the CMB temperature power spectrum. Their recent analysis of the latest cosmological data prefers nonzero neutrino masses, mnu = 0.32+-0.11 eV. This result, if confirmed by the upcoming Planck data, has deep implications on the discovery of the nature of neutrinos. In particular, the values of the effective neutrino mass involved in neutrinoless double beta decay (bb0nu) are severely constrained for both the direct and inverse hierarchy, making a discovery much more likely. In this paper, we focus in xenon-based bb0nu experiments, on the double grounds of their good performance and the suitability of the technology to large-mass scaling. We show that the current generation, with effective masses in the range of 100 kg and conceivable exposures in the range of 500 kg year, could already have a sizable opportunity to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
