Third Harmonic Flow of Charged Particles in Au+Au Collisions at sqrtsNN = 200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M., Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, J. Alford, C. D. Anson, A. Aparin, D., Arkhipkin, E. Aschenauer, G. S. Averichev, J. Balewski, A. Banerjee, Z., Barnovska, D. R. Beavis, R. Bellwied, M. J. Betancourt

TL;DR
This paper measures the third harmonic flow coefficient v_3 of charged particles in gold-gold collisions at 200 GeV, revealing pseudorapidity gap dependence and comparing results with models and other experiments.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurement of triangular flow v_3 in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV using multiple analysis methods and pseudorapidity gap techniques.
Findings
Triangular flow v_3 varies with transverse momentum and centrality.
Pseudorapidity gap significantly affects v_3 measurements.
Results are consistent with some model predictions and differ from others.
Abstract
We report measurements of the third harmonic coefficient of the azimuthal anisotropy, v_3, known as triangular flow. The analysis is for charged particles in Au+Au collisions at sqrtsNN = 200 GeV, based on data from the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Two-particle correlations as a function of their pseudorapidity separation are fit with narrow and wide Gaussians. Measurements of triangular flow are extracted from the wide Gaussian, from two-particle cumulants with a pseudorapidity gap, and also from event plane analysis methods with a large pseudorapidity gap between the particles and the event plane. These results are reported as a function of transverse momentum and centrality. A large dependence on the pseudorapidity gap is found. Results are compared with other experiments and model calculations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
