CFHTLenS: Higher-order galaxy-mass correlations probed by galaxy-galaxy-galaxy lensing
P. Simon, T. Erben, P. Schneider, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, T. D. Kitching, Y. Mellier, L. Miller, L. Van Waerbeke, C. Bonnett,, J. Coupon, L. Fu, M. J. Hudson, K. Kuijken, B. T. P. Rowe, T. Schrabback, E., Semboloni, M. Velander

TL;DR
This paper measures the galaxy-matter bispectrum using galaxy-galaxy-galaxy lensing in CFHTLenS, revealing how it varies with galaxy properties and providing new insights into galaxy biasing.
Contribution
First direct measurement of galaxy-matter bispectrum as a function of galaxy properties using G3L on CFHTLenS data, including constraints on stochastic galaxy biasing.
Findings
Bispectra vary significantly with galaxy luminosity and stellar mass.
More luminous or massive galaxies show a stronger bispectrum signal.
Luminous late-type galaxies show no detectable excess mass, unlike early-types.
Abstract
We present the first direct measurement of the galaxy-matter bispectrum as a function of galaxy luminosity, stellar mass, and SED type. Our analysis uses a galaxy-galaxy-galaxy lensing technique (G3L), on angular scales between 9 arcsec to 50 arcmin, to quantify (i) the excess surface mass density around galaxy pairs (excess mass hereafter) and (ii) the excess shear-shear correlations around single galaxies, both of which yield a measure of two types of galaxy-matter bispectra. We apply our method to the state-of-the-art Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS), spanning 154 square degrees. This survey allows us to detect a significant change of the bispectra with lens properties. Measurements for lens populations with distinct redshift distributions become comparable by a newly devised normalisation technique. That will also aid future comparisons to other surveys or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
