Single nanowire solar cells beyond the Shockley-Queisser limit
Peter Krogstrup, Henrik Ingerslev J{\o}rgensen, Martin Heiss, Olivier, Demichel, Jeppe V. Holm, Martin Aagesen, Jesper Nygard, Anna Fontcuberta i, Morral

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that single GaAs nanowire solar cells can surpass the Shockley-Queisser limit by utilizing their light concentrating properties, achieving significantly higher photocurrent than traditional models predict.
Contribution
The paper reveals how nanowire geometry enhances light absorption and photocurrent, pushing efficiency beyond conventional theoretical limits for III-V solar cells.
Findings
Photocurrent exceeds Lambert-Beer law predictions by over an order of magnitude.
Standing nanowire acts as a light concentrator, increasing absorption.
Potential for higher efficiency limits in nanowire-based photovoltaic devices.
Abstract
Light management is of great importance to photovoltaic cells, as it determines the fraction of incident light entering the device. An optimal pn-junction combined with an optimal light absorption can lead to a solar cell efficiency above the Shockley-Queisser limit. Here, we show how this is possible by studying photocurrent generation for a single core-shell p-i-n junction GaAs nanowire solar cell grown on a silicon substrate. At one sun illumination a short circuit current of 180 mA/cm^2 is obtained, which is more than one order of magnitude higher than what would be predicted from Lambert-Beer law. The enhanced light absorption is shown to be due to a light concentrating property of the standing nanowire as shown by photocurrent maps of the device. The results imply new limits for the maximum efficiency obtainable with III-V based nanowire solar cells under one sun illumination.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
