Some remarks on the Pigola-Rigoli-Setti version of the Omori-Yau maximum principle
Francisco Fontenele, Alexandre Paiva Barreto

TL;DR
This paper establishes that the Pigola-Rigoli-Setti version of the Omori-Yau maximum principle is equivalent to the existence of a proper $C^2$ function with bounded gradient and Hessian on the manifold, broadening its applicability.
Contribution
It proves the logical equivalence between the Pigola-Rigoli-Setti hypotheses and the existence of a specific proper function, extending the Omori-Yau maximum principle beyond curvature bounds.
Findings
Equivalence of hypotheses and proper function existence
Extension of Omori-Yau principle scope
Broader applicability beyond curvature bounds
Abstract
We prove that the hypotheses in the version of the Omori-Yau maximum principle that was given by Pigola-Rigoli-Setti are logically equivalent to the assumption that the manifold carries a proper function whose gradient and Hessian (Laplacian) are bounded. In particular, this result extends the scope of the original Omori-Yau principle, formulated in terms of lower bounds for curvature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
