An X-ray and Multiwavelength Survey of Highly Radio-Loud Quasars at z > 4: Jet-Linked Emission in the Brightest Radio Beacons of the Early Universe
Jianfeng Wu, W. N. Brandt, Brendan P. Miller, Gordon P. Garmire,, Donald P. Schneider, and Cristian Vignali

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes the X-ray and multiwavelength properties of 17 highly radio-loud quasars at z > 4, revealing significant X-ray emission enhancement likely linked to inverse Compton scattering of cosmic microwave background photons, and providing new insights into jet-linked emission in the early universe.
Contribution
First comprehensive X-ray and multiwavelength survey of z > 4 highly radio-loud quasars, demonstrating significant X-ray enhancement and exploring jet-related emission mechanisms.
Findings
HRLQs at z > 4 show ~3 times higher X-ray emission than lower redshift counterparts.
X-ray enhancement remains significant after bias correction, confirmed at 3-4 sigma level.
No strong correlation between X-ray brightness and optical/UV emission-line REWs.
Abstract
(Abridged) We present a systematic study of the X-ray and multiwavelength properties of a sample of 17 highly radio-loud quasars (HRLQs) at z > 4 with sensitive X-ray coverage from new Chandra and archival Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Swift observations. Eight of the new and archival observations are reported in this work for the first time. New Chandra observations of two moderately radio-loud and highly optically luminous quasars at z > 4 are also reported. Our HRLQ sample represents the top ~5% of radio-loud quasars in terms of radio loudness. We found that our HRLQs have an X-ray emission enhancement over HRLQs at lower redshifts (by a typical factor of ~3), and this effect, after controlling for several factors which may introduce biases, has been solidly estimated to be significant at the 3-4 sigma level. HRLQs at z=3-4 are also found to have a similar X-ray emission enhancement over…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
