A Comparison Between Nonlinear Force-Free Field and Potential Field Models Using Full-Disk SDO/HMI Magnetogram
Tilaye Tadesse, T. Wiegelmann, B.Inhester, K.Olson, P. J. MacNeice, A., Pevtsov

TL;DR
This study compares nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) and potential field models using full-disk SDO/HMI magnetogram data, demonstrating that NLFFF provides a more accurate reconstruction of the solar coronal magnetic field.
Contribution
It introduces a spherical NLFFF modeling approach for large-scale solar magnetic fields and compares its effectiveness with potential field models using full-disk data.
Findings
NLFFF models better reconstruct magnetic configurations than potential field models.
Much of the trans-equatorial loops are current-free.
NLFFF captures large-scale magnetic structures more accurately.
Abstract
Measurements of magnetic fields and electric currents in the pre-eruptive corona are crucial to study solar eruptive phenomena, like flare and coronal mass ejections(CMEs). However, spectro-polarimetric measurements of certain photospheric lines permit a determination of the vector magnetic field at the photosphere. Thus, substantial collection of magnetograms relate to the photospheric surface field only. Numerical modeling is carried out by applying state-of-the-art nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) reconstruction. Cartesian nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) codes are not well suited for larger domains, since the spherical nature of the solar surface cannot be neglected when the field of view is large. One of the most significant results of Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) mission to date has been repeated observations of large, almost global scale events in which large scale…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
