A Theological Argument for an Everett Multiverse
Don N. Page

TL;DR
This paper presents a theological argument suggesting that the existence of an Everett multiverse aligns with the idea of a benevolent God who values creating a universe with mathematical elegance, even with suffering.
Contribution
It offers a novel philosophical argument linking the Everett multiverse to divine attributes and the principle of the universe being the best possible world.
Findings
Multiverse may be the result of divine adherence to physical laws
God's preference for elegant laws influences universe's structure
Quantum unitarity leads to many-worlds interpretation
Abstract
Science looks for the simplest hypotheses to explain observations. Starting with the simple assumption that {\em the actual world is the best possible world}, I sketch an {\it Optimal Argument for the Existence of God}, that the sufferings in our universe would not be consistent with its being alone the best possible world, but the total world could be the best possible if it includes an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God who experiences great value in creating and knowing a universe with great mathematical elegance, even though such a universe has suffering. God seems loathe to violate elegant laws of physics that He has chosen to use in His creation, such as Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism or Einstein's equations of general relativity for gravity within their classical domains of applicability, even if their violation could greatly reduce human suffering (e.g., from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
