Bosonic bunching does not reveal stronger quantum contextuality
Adan Cabello

TL;DR
The paper critiques recent claims that bosonic bunching experiments can demonstrate stronger quantum contextuality, arguing that the experimental setups do not meet the necessary conditions for such violations.
Contribution
It clarifies the conditions required for observing quantum contextuality and refutes claims that bosonic bunching experiments violate these conditions.
Findings
Claims of violating NC inequalities are unfounded due to experimental setup issues.
Physical events in the experiments lack the assumed exclusivity relationships.
Theoretical analysis shows no violation of quantum contextuality in the discussed experiments.
Abstract
In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
