A precise and accurate determination of the cosmic microwave background temperature at z=0.89
S. Muller (1), A. Beelen (2), J. H. Black (1), S. J. Curran (3,4), C., Horellou (1), S. Aalto (1), F. Combes (5), M. Guelin (6,7), C. Henkel, (8,9) ((1) Department of Earth, Space Sciences, Chalmers University of, Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, Onsala, Sweden (2) Institut

TL;DR
This paper measures the cosmic microwave background temperature at redshift 0.89 with high precision, confirming the standard cosmological model's predictions and improving the accuracy of such measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Monte-Carlo Markov Chain method combined with non-LTE radiative transfer modeling to precisely determine Tcmb at z=0.89.
Findings
Measured Tcmb=5.08 ± 0.10 K at z=0.89
Results are consistent with standard cosmological predictions
Achieved the most precise Tcmb measurement at z>0 to date
Abstract
According to the Big Bang theory and as a consequence of adiabatic expansion of the Universe, the temperature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) increases linearly with redshift. This relation is, however, poorly explored, and detection of any deviation would directly lead to (astro-)physics beyond the standard model. We aim at measuring the temperature of the CMB with an accuracy of a few percent at z=0.89 toward the molecular absorber in the galaxy lensing the quasar PKS1830-211. We adopt a Monte-Carlo Markov Chain approach, coupled with predictions from the non-LTE radiative transfer code RADEX, to solve the excitation of a set of various molecular species directly from their spectra. We determine Tcmb=5.08 pm 0.10 K at 68% confidence level. Our measurement is consistent with the value Tcmb=5.14 K predicted by the standard cosmological model with adiabatic expansion of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
