Use of BESTEST procedure to improve a building thermal simulation program
Ted Soubdhan (GRER), Thierry Alex Mara (PIMENT), Harry Boyer (PIMENT),, Anis Youn\`es (IMFS)

TL;DR
This paper discusses applying the BESTEST procedure to validate and improve a building thermal simulation program by identifying bugs and assessing heat transfer models.
Contribution
It demonstrates how BESTEST can be used to detect errors and validate models in building energy simulation software.
Findings
Identification of bugs in the simulation program
Validation of heat transfer conduction models
Improved reliability of the simulation results
Abstract
Validation of building energy simulation programs is of major interest to both users and modellers. To achieve such a task, it is essential to apply a methodology based on a priori test and empirical validation. A priori test consists in verifying that models embedded in a program and their implementation are correct. this should be achieved before carrying out experiments. The aim of this report is to present results from the application of the BESTEST procedure to our code. We will emphasise the way it allows to find bugs in our program and also how it permits to qualify models of heat transfer by conduction
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
