Galileon Radiation from Binary Systems
Claudia de Rham, Andrew Matas, Andrew J. Tolley

TL;DR
This paper investigates scalar radiation from binary systems within Galileon theories, revealing breakdowns in classical perturbation methods for higher-order Galileons and proposing conditions where reliable calculations are possible.
Contribution
It analyzes scalar radiation in binary systems for general Galileon theories, highlighting limitations of perturbation theory for quartic and quintic cases and identifying regimes for valid calculations.
Findings
Classical perturbation theory breaks down for quartic/quintic Galileons in realistic pulsar systems.
Higher multipoles radiate with similar strength in these theories, unlike in cubic Galileons.
Perturbation theory is reliable when there's a large mass hierarchy or at scales below the inverse pulsar frequency.
Abstract
We calculate the power emitted in scalar modes for a binary systems, including binary pulsars, with a conformal coupling to the most general Galileon effective field theory by considering perturbations around a static, spherical background. While this method is effective for calculating the power in the cubic Galileon case, here we find that if the quartic or quintic Galileon dominate, for realistic pulsar systems the classical perturbative expansion about spherically symmetric backgrounds breaks down (although the quantum effective theory is well-defined). The basic reason is that the equations of motion for the fluctuations are then effectively one dimensional. This leads to many multipoles radiating with equal strength, as opposed to the normal Minkowski spacetime and cubic Galileon cases, where increasing multipoles are suppressed by increasing powers of the orbital velocity. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
