Calibrating [OII] star-formation rates at z>1 from dual H\alpha-[OII] imaging from HiZELS
Masao Hayashi, David Sobral, Philip N. Best, Ian Smail, Tadayuki, Kodama

TL;DR
This study calibrates the relationship between H extalpha ext and [OII] emission lines at z=1.47, revealing systematic differences in dust attenuation and implications for star formation rate estimates in high-redshift galaxies.
Contribution
It provides a new calibration of [OII]-based star formation rates at z>1, accounting for dust attenuation differences from local relations.
Findings
[OII] emitters at z=1.47 have lower dust attenuation than local galaxies.
The H extalpha/[OII] ratio correlates with luminosity similarly to local galaxies.
[OII] selection biases towards less dusty galaxies at high redshift.
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between H\alpha\ and [OII](\lambda 3727) emission in faint star-forming galaxies at z=1.47 with dust uncorrected star formation rates (SFRs) down to 1.4 Msun/yr, using data in two narrow-bands from WFCAM/UKIRT and Suprime-Cam/Subaru. A stacking analysis allows us to investigate H\alpha\ emission flux from bright [OII] emitters as well as faint ones for which H\alpha\ is not individually detected, and to compare them with a large sample of local galaxies. We find that there is a clear, positive correlation between the average H\alpha\ and [OII] luminosities for [OII] emitters at z=1.47, with its slope being consistent with the local relation. [OII] emitters at z=1.47 have lower mean observed ratios of H\alpha/[OII] suggesting a small but systematic offset (at 2.8\sigma\ significance) towards lower values of dust attenuation, A(H\alpha)~0.35, than local…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
