On the non-attractive character of gravity in f(R) theories
F. D. Albareti (Madrid Complutense University), J. A. R. Cembranos, (Madrid Complutense University), A. de la Cruz-Dombriz (ACGC, University, of Cape Town), A. Dobado (Madrid Complutense University)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the potential for f(R) gravity theories to produce a positive contribution to the Raychaudhuri equation, challenging the traditional view of gravity's always attractive nature in General Relativity.
Contribution
It derives explicit upper bounds for geometric contributions in f(R) theories and analyzes parameter constraints to allow for a non-attractive, possibly repulsive, gravitational effect.
Findings
Explicit upper bounds for geometric contributions in f(R) models.
Parameter constraints for positive contributions in specific f(R) models.
Implications for the equivalent Brans-Dicke formulation.
Abstract
In General Relativity without a cosmological constant a non-positive contribution from the space-time geometry to Raychaudhuri equation is found provided that particular energy conditions are assumed and regardless the considered solution of the Einstein's equations. This fact is usually interpreted as a manifestation of the attractive character of gravity. Nevertheless, a positive contribution to Raychaudhuri equation from space-time geometry should occur since this is the case in an accelerated expanding Robertson-Walker model for congruences followed by fundamental observers. Modified gravity theories provide the possibility of a positive contribution although the standard energy conditions are assumed. We address this important issue in the context of f(R) theories, deriving explicit upper bounds for the contribution of space-time geometry to the Raychaudhuri equation. Then, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
