Combining and comparing neutrinoless double beta decay experiments using different nuclei
Johannes Bergstrom

TL;DR
This paper conducts a comprehensive Bayesian analysis of neutrinoless double beta decay experiments across different nuclei, assessing the consistency of claims and measurements, and accounting for nuclear matrix element uncertainties.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework to compare and combine results from different experiments, explicitly incorporating nuclear matrix element uncertainties and testing the compatibility of conflicting data.
Findings
Strong evidence for a peak in Ge-76 data
Moderate evidence of incompatibility between Ge-76 and Xe-136 data
Negligible combined evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay when data are combined
Abstract
We perform a global fit of the most relevant neutrinoless double beta decay experiments within the standard model with massive Majorana neutrinos. Using Bayesian inference makes it possible to take into account the theoretical uncertainties on the nuclear matrix elements in a fully consistent way. First, we analyze the data used to claim the observation of neutrinoless double beta decay in Ge-76, and find strong evidence (according to Jeffrey's scale) for a peak in the spectrum and moderate evidence for that the peak is actually close to the energy expected for the neutrinoless decay. We also find a significantly larger statistical error than the original analysis, which we include in the comparison with other data. Then, we statistically test the consistency between this claim with that of recent measurements using Xe-136. We find that the two data sets are about 40 to 80 times more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
