Continuum tensor network field states, path integral representations and the encoding of spatial symmetries
David Jennings, Christoph Brockt, Jutho Haegeman, Tobias J. Osborne,, and Frank Verstraete

TL;DR
This paper develops a continuum tensor network framework for quantum field states, illustrating path integral representations, symmetry encoding, and the connection to entanglement entropy laws, bridging many-body physics, quantum field theory, and quantum information.
Contribution
It introduces a continuum tensor network approach for quantum fields, including a path integral representation and symmetry encoding, extending tensor network methods to quantum field theories.
Findings
All Fock space states can be represented as cMPS with infinite parameters.
A well-behaved field limit of PEPS in 2D provides a class of symmetric quantum field states.
Physical symmetries are encoded via auxiliary fields with Lorentz invariance.
Abstract
A natural way to generalise tensor network variational classes to quantum field systems is via a continuous tensor contraction. This approach is first illustrated for the class of quantum field states known as continuous matrix-product states (cMPS). As a simple example of the path-integral representation we show that the state of a dynamically evolving quantum field admits a natural representation as a cMPS. A completeness argument is also provided that shows that all states in Fock space admit a cMPS representation when the number of variational parameters tends to infinity. Beyond this, we obtain a well-behaved field limit of projected entangled pair states (PEPS) in two dimensions that provide an abstract class of quantum field states with natural symmetries. We demonstrate how symmetries of the physical field state are encoded within the dynamics of an auxiliary field system of one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
