Assessment of density functional methods with correct asymptotic behavior
Chen-Wei Tsai, Yu-Chuan Su, Guan-De Li, and Jeng-Da Chai

TL;DR
This paper compares long-range corrected hybrid functionals and asymptotically corrected model potentials, showing LC hybrids generally outperform AC models across various applications, and introduces new benchmark databases for assessing density functional methods.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive performance comparison of LC hybrid and AC model potential schemes and introduces new benchmark databases for evaluating density functional methods.
Findings
LC hybrid scheme outperforms AC model potential scheme
Expanded databases for electron affinities and atomization energies
New benchmark database AE113 for atomization energies
Abstract
Long-range corrected (LC) hybrid functionals and asymptotically corrected (AC) model potentials are two distinct density functional methods with correct asymptotic behavior. They are known to be accurate for properties that are sensitive to the asymptote of the exchange-correlation potential, such as the highest occupied molecular orbital energies and Rydberg excitation energies of molecules. To provide a comprehensive comparison, we investigate the performance of the two schemes and others on a very wide range of applications, including the asymptote problems, self-interaction-error problems, energy-gap problems, charge-transfer problems, and many others. The LC hybrid scheme is shown to consistently outperform the AC model potential scheme. In addition, to be consistent with the molecules collected in the IP131 database [Y.-S. Lin, C.-W. Tsai, G.-D. Li, and J.-D. Chai, J. Chem. Phys.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
