Role of the sampling weight in evaluating classical time autocorrelation functions
Tomas Zimmermann, Jiri Vanicek

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different sampling weights impact the efficiency of Monte Carlo methods for computing classical time autocorrelation functions, proposing an optimal weight that reduces computational cost.
Contribution
It introduces a sampling weight that makes the Monte Carlo evaluation cost independent of system size and dynamics, improving efficiency over standard methods.
Findings
Optimal sampling weight reduces convergence cost
Standard sampling may scale exponentially with system size
For harmonic systems, standard sampling cost is dimension-independent
Abstract
We analyze how the choice of the sampling weight affects the efficiency of the Monte Carlo evaluation of classical time autocorrelation functions. Assuming uncorrelated sampling or sampling with constant correlation length, we propose a sampling weight for which the number of trajectories needed for convergence is independent of the correlated quantity, dimensionality, dynamics, and phase-space density. In contrast, it is shown that the computational cost of the "standard" intuitive algorithm which samples directly from the phase-space density may scale exponentially with the number of degrees of freedom. Yet, for the stationary Gaussian distribution of harmonic systems and for the autocorrelation function of a linear function of phase-space coordinates, the computational cost of this standard algorithm is also independent of dimensionality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
