Rectangular tileability and complementary tileability are undecidable
Jed Yang

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether a set of polyominoes can tile a rectangle or a cofinite subset of the plane is undecidable, but provides an algorithm for a specific rectangle tiling problem.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of rectangular and complementary tileability problems and introduces an algorithm for a particular finite-region complement tiling problem.
Findings
Tileability of rectangles by polyominoes is undecidable.
Tileability of cofinite plane subsets is undecidable for many variants.
An algorithm exists for testing tileability of the complement of a finite region by rectangles.
Abstract
Does a given a set of polyominoes tile some rectangle? We show that this problem is undecidable. In a different direction, we also consider tiling a cofinite subset of the plane. The tileability is undecidable for many variants of this problem. However, we present an algorithm for testing whether the complement of a finite region is tileable by a set of rectangles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Automata and Applications · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · semigroups and automata theory
