Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of electromagnetic moments and transitions in A <= 9 nuclei with meson-exchange currents derived from chiral effective field theory
S. Pastore, Steven C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, R. B. Wiringa

TL;DR
This paper presents Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of electromagnetic properties in light nuclei, incorporating meson-exchange currents from chiral effective field theory, achieving excellent agreement with experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel implementation of meson-exchange currents derived from chiral effective field theory into Quantum Monte Carlo calculations for light nuclei.
Findings
Two-body meson-exchange currents significantly improve agreement with experimental magnetic moments.
MEC contributions account for up to 20-40% of magnetic moments in A=9 nuclei.
Chiral EFT-based MEC operators provide a consistent framework for nuclear electromagnetic calculations.
Abstract
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of electromagnetic moments and transitions are reported for A <= 9 nuclei. The realistic Argonne v18 two-nucleon and Illinois-7 three-nucleon potentials are used to generate the nuclear wave functions. Contributions of two-body meson-exchange current (MEC) operators are included for magnetic moments and M1 transitions. The MEC operators have been derived in both a standard nuclear physics approach and a chiral effective field theory formulation with pions and nucleons including up to one-loop corrections. The two-body MEC contributions provide significant corrections and lead to very good agreement with experiment. Their effect is particularly pronounced in the A=9, T=3/2 systems, in which they provide up to 20% (40 %) of the total predicted value for the 9Li (9C) magnetic moment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
