Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model
Nicol\'as Maffione, Luciano Darriba, Pablo Cincotta, Claudia, Giordano

TL;DR
This paper compares variational chaos indicators and spectral analysis methods in a self-consistent triaxial stellar model, demonstrating that variational indicators like SElLCE are more reliable for distinguishing chaos from order.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparative analysis of chaos detection tools, highlighting the effectiveness of the SElLCE over FMFT in analyzing a triaxial stellar dynamical model.
Findings
SElLCE reliably distinguishes chaotic and regular regions.
FMFT is less reliable than SElLCE for chaos detection.
Variational indicators outperform spectral methods in this context.
Abstract
Together with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection. The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating the chaotic and the regular component. In fact, we show herein that the variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
