Complexity and the Limits of Revolution: What Will Happen to the Arab Spring?
Alexander S. Gard-Murray, Yaneer Bar-Yam

TL;DR
This paper uses a complex systems approach to analyze the Arab Spring, suggesting that the complexity required for democracies makes them more fragile after revolutions compared to autocracies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel complex systems framework to understand regime change, emphasizing the role of systemic complexity in the stability of post-revolution governments.
Findings
Democracies require higher systemic complexity than autocracies.
Revolutions can reduce systemic complexity, hindering democratic development.
Without stable institutions, new governments risk reverting to autocracy.
Abstract
The recent social unrest across the Middle East and North Africa has deposed dictators who had ruled for decades. While the events have been hailed as an "Arab Spring" by those who hope that repressive autocracies will be replaced by democracies, what sort of regimes will eventually emerge from the crisis remains far from certain. Here we provide a complex systems framework, validated by historical precedent, to help answer this question. We describe the dynamics of governmental change as an evolutionary process similar to biological evolution, in which complex organizations gradually arise by replication, variation and competitive selection. Different kinds of governments, however, have differing levels of complexity. Democracies must be more systemically complex than autocracies because of their need to incorporate large numbers of people in decision-making. This difference has…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
