Almost all sets of d+2 points on the (d-1)-sphere are not subtransitive
Sean Eberhard

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that nearly all configurations of d+2 points on a (d-1)-sphere cannot be embedded into a transitive set in any Euclidean space, extending previous arguments to a broader class of point sets.
Contribution
It generalizes an existing argument to show that almost all sets of d+2 points on the (d-1)-sphere are not subtransitive in any Euclidean space.
Findings
Most d+2 point sets on the (d-1)-sphere are not subtransitive.
The result extends previous work to a more general setting.
Almost all such point sets lack a transitive embedding.
Abstract
We generalise an argument of Leader, Russell, and Walters to show that almost all sets of d + 2 points on the (d - 1)-sphere S^{d-1} are not contained in a transitive set in some R^n.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Point processes and geometric inequalities · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
