Emerging understanding of the \Delta I = 1/2 Rule from Lattice QCD
P. A. Boyle, N. H. Christ, N. Garron, E. J. Goode, T. Janowski, C., Lehner, Q. Liu, A. T. Lytle, C. T. Sachrajda, A. Soni, D. Zhang (for the RBC, Collaboration, for the UKQCD Collaboration)

TL;DR
This paper uses lattice QCD calculations to explore the I=1/2 rule, revealing that cancellations and enhancements in decay amplitudes explain the rule's origin, with results matching experimental data.
Contribution
It provides a novel lattice QCD analysis showing how cancellations and enhancements in decay amplitudes account for the I=1/2 rule, incorporating physical quark masses and kinematics.
Findings
Re A_2 is reproduced with physical quark masses and kinematics.
Partial cancellation of dominant contributions explains Re A_2.
Enhancement of Re A_0 arises from same-sign contributions that cancel in Re A_2.
Abstract
There has been much speculation as to the origin of the \Delta I = 1/2 rule (Re A_0/Re A_2 \simeq 22.5). We find that the two dominant contributions to the \Delta I=3/2, K \to \pi \pi{} correlation functions have opposite signs leading to a significant cancellation. This partial cancellation occurs in our computation of Re A_2 with physical quark masses and kinematics (where we reproduce the experimental value of A_2) and also for heavier pions at threshold. For Re A_0, although we do not have results at physical kinematics, we do have results for pions at zero-momentum with m_\pi{} \simeq 420 MeV (Re A_0/Re A_2=9.1(2.1)) and m_\pi{} \simeq 330 MeV (Re A_0/Re A_2=12.0(1.7)). The contributions which partially cancel in Re A_2 are also the largest ones in Re A_0, but now they have the same sign and so enhance this amplitude. The emerging explanation of the \Delta I=1/2 rule is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
