
TL;DR
This paper critiques the shift from experimental to metaphysical approaches in physics, analyzing examples like the Gutzwiller method, tunneling, irregular motion, and special relativity foundations.
Contribution
It highlights the importance of experiment in physics and critiques recent theoretical trends that neglect empirical validation.
Findings
Critique of the Gutzwiller approach
Analysis of classical tunneling description
Discussion on the foundations of special relativity
Abstract
Experiment plays a decisive role in physics. It is the single source of our understanding of nature. But, during the last century the main accent in theoretical physics has moved toward metaphysics. Some mathematicians/theoreticians try to develop new approaches, ignoring experiments. Three examples of such treatment are discussed here: the Gutzwiller approach, the classical description of the tunneling phenomenon and the role of irregular motion in classical mechanics. The foundations of special relativity are also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
