Emphasizing the different trends of the existing data for the $\gamma^*\gamma \to \pi^0$ transition form factor
A. P. Bakulev, S. V. Mikhailov, A. V. Pimikov, N. G. Stefanis

TL;DR
This paper analyzes recent experimental data on the $^*\gamma \to \pi^0$ transition form factor, revealing discrepancies between Belle and BaBar results and comparing them with theoretical predictions using light-cone sum rules.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of Belle and BaBar data on the transition form factor using light-cone sum rules and highlights the inconsistency between the datasets.
Findings
Belle data agrees with theoretical predictions
BaBar data conflicts with Belle and theory
No overlap between Belle and BaBar data at 1-sigma level
Abstract
The new data on the transition form factor of the Belle Collaboration are analyzed in comparison with those of BaBar (including the older data of CELLO and CLEO) using an approach based on light-cone sum rules. Performing a 2-, and a 3-parametric fit to these data, we found that the Belle and the BaBar data have no overlap at the level. While the Belle data agree with our predictions, the Babar data are in conflict with them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
