Finite and infinite basis in P and NP
Koji Kobayashi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach to the P vs NP problem using the concept of bases in function spaces, suggesting NP-Complete problems cannot be expressed within P due to their infinite dimensionality.
Contribution
It proposes a new perspective on P vs NP by analyzing the cardinality of bases in function spaces, linking problem complexity to basis dimensionality and fixed point operators.
Findings
NP-Complete problems are in infinite-dimensional function spaces.
P-Complete problems have at most finite bases.
NP-Complete problems cannot be described in P.
Abstract
This article provide new approach to solve P vs NP problem by using cardinality of bases function. About NP-Complete problems, we can divide to infinite disjunction of P-Complete problems. These P-Complete problems are independent of each other in disjunction. That is, NP-Complete problem is in infinite dimension function space that bases are P-Complete. The other hand, any P-Complete problem have at most a finite number of P-Complete basis. The reason is that each P problems have at most finite number of Least fixed point operator. Therefore, we cannot describe NP-Complete problems in P. We can also prove this result from incompleteness of P.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
