Self-propulsion in viscoelastic fluids: pushers vs. pullers
Lailai Zhu, Eric Lauga, Luca Brandt

TL;DR
This study uses numerical simulations to analyze how viscoelastic fluids affect the swimming behavior of spherical microorganisms, revealing decreased speeds, altered flow fields, and increased efficiency compared to Newtonian fluids, with distinctions between pusher and puller types.
Contribution
It provides a detailed numerical analysis of the effects of viscoelastic stresses on microswimmer kinematics, energetics, and flow fields, highlighting differences between pusher and puller swimmers.
Findings
Viscoelasticity reduces swimming speed compared to Newtonian fluids.
Polymeric stresses contribute significantly to energy dynamics.
Hydrodynamic efficiency is higher in viscoelastic fluids at optimal Weissenberg numbers.
Abstract
We use numerical simulations to address locomotion at zero Reynolds number in viscoelastic (Giesekus) fluids. The swimmers are assumed to be spherical, to self-propel using tangential surface deformation, and the computations are implemented using a finite element method. The emphasis of the study is on the change of the swimming kinematics, energetics, and flow disturbance from Newtonian to viscoelastic, and on the distinction between pusher and puller swimmers. In all cases, the viscoelastic swimming speed is below the Newtonian one, with a minimum obtained for intermediate values of the Weissenberg number, . An analysis of the flow field places the origin of this swimming degradation in non-Newtonian elongational stresses. The power required for swimming is also systematically below the Newtonian power, and always a decreasing function of . A detail energetic balance of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
