Coalescence of Liquid Drops: Different Models Versus Experiment
James Sprittles, Yulii Shikhmurzaev

TL;DR
This study compares two models of liquid drop coalescence with experimental data, finding that the interface formation/disappearance model better describes the early stages of coalescence.
Contribution
It introduces and validates a new model based on interface formation/disappearance, contrasting it with the conventional instant-bridge model.
Findings
The interface formation/disappearance model aligns better with experimental data.
Conventional models' scaling laws have limited validity.
New experiments are proposed to further investigate coalescence.
Abstract
The process of coalescence of two identical liquid drops is simulated numerically in the framework of two essentially different mathematical models, and the results are compared with experimental data on the very early stages of the coalescence process reported recently. The first model tested is the `conventional' one, where it is assumed that coalescence as the formation of a single body of fluid occurs by an instant appearance of a liquid bridge smoothly connecting the two drops, and the subsequent process is the evolution of this single body of fluid driven by capillary forces. The second model under investigation considers coalescence as a process where a section of the free surface becomes trapped between the bulk phases as the drops are pressed against each other, and it is the gradual disappearance of this `internal interface' that leads to the formation of a single body of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
