Socializing the h-index
Graham Cormode, Qiang Ma, S. Muthukrishnan, Brian Thompson

TL;DR
The paper introduces the Social h-index, a new bibliometric measure that redistributes individual impact scores to better reflect collaborative contributions within research communities.
Contribution
It proposes the Social h-index, a novel variant of the h-index that accounts for collaborative impact, addressing limitations of traditional individual metrics.
Findings
The Social h-index provides a different perspective on researcher impact.
Examples demonstrate how the Social h-index differs from traditional h-index.
Discussion highlights properties and advantages of the new measure.
Abstract
A variety of bibliometric measures have been proposed to quantify the impact of researchers and their work. The h-index is a notable and widely-used example which aims to improve over simple metrics such as raw counts of papers or citations. However, a limitation of this measure is that it considers authors in isolation and does not account for contributions through a collaborative team. To address this, we propose a natural variant that we dub the Social h-index. The idea is to redistribute the h-index score to reflect an individual's impact on the research community. In addition to describing this new measure, we provide examples, discuss its properties, and contrast with other measures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
