The Metal Aversion of LGRBs
J. F. Graham (1,2), A. S. Fruchter (1) ((1) Space Telescope Science, Institute, (2) Johns Hopkins University)

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the low-metallicity preference of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) is intrinsic or due to galaxy star-formation-metallicity correlation, finding it is likely intrinsic to LGRB physics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that LGRBs prefer low-metallicity environments independently of star formation-metallicity anti-correlation, highlighting intrinsic astrophysical factors.
Findings
LGRB hosts are predominantly at metallicities below 12+log(O/H) < 8.6.
Less than 10% of local star formation occurs at similar low metallicities.
The metallicity bias of LGRBs is not caused by redshift evolution of galaxy metallicity.
Abstract
Recently, it has been suggested that the metallicity aversion of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) is not intrinsic to their formation, but rather a consequence of the anti-correlation between star-formation and metallicity seen in the general galaxy population. To investigate this proposal, we compare the metallicity of the hosts of LGRBs, broad-lined Type Ic (Ic-bl) supernovae (SNe), and Type II SNe to each other and to the metallicity distribution of star-forming galaxies using the SDSS to represent galaxies in the local universe and the TKRS for galaxies at intermediate redshifts. The differing metallicity distributions of the LGRB hosts and the star formation in local galaxies forces us to conclude that the low-metallicity preference of LGRBs is not primarily driven by the anti-correlation between star-formation and metallicity, but rather must be overwhelmingly due to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
