The 130 GeV gamma-ray line and generic dark matter model building constraints from continuum gamma rays, radio and antiproton data
Masaki Asano, Torsten Bringmann, Gunter Sigl, Martin Vollmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates the 130 GeV gamma-ray line potentially caused by dark matter annihilation, analyzing constraints from various astrophysical data to evaluate the viability of different dark matter models and their particle interactions.
Contribution
It provides a model-independent relation between tree level and loop amplitudes in dark matter annihilation and assesses constraints from gamma rays, radio, and antiproton data on these processes.
Findings
Charged standard model particles in loops are generally in tension with observational constraints.
Loops dominated by top quarks are less constrained and more viable.
Internal bremsstrahlung explanations are not strongly constrained by these data.
Abstract
An analysis of the Fermi gamma ray space telescope data has recently revealed a resolved gamma-ray feature close to the galactic center which is consistent with monochromatic photons at an energy of about 130 GeV. If interpreted in terms of dark matter (DM) annihilating into \gamma\gamma (\gamma Z, \gamma h), this would correspond to a DM particle mass of roughly 130 GeV (145 GeV, 155 GeV). The rate for these loop-suppressed processes, however, is larger than typically expected for thermally produced DM. Correspondingly, one would generically expect even larger tree level production rates of standard model fermions or gauge bosons. Here, we quantify this expectation in a rather model-independent way by relating the tree level and loop amplitudes with the help of the optical theorem. As an application, we consider bounds from continuum gamma rays, radio and antiproton data on the tree…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
