Evidence for CO shock excitation in NGC 6240 from Herschel SPIRE spectroscopy
R. Meijerink, L. E. Kristensen, A. Weiss, P. P. van der Werf, F., Walter, M. Spaans, A. F. Loenen, J. Fischer, F. P. Israel, K. Isaak, P. P., Papadopoulos, S. Aalto, L. Armus, V. Charmandaris, K. M. Dasyra, T., Diaz-Santos, A. Evans, Y. Gao, E. Gonzalez-Alfonso, R. Guesten

TL;DR
This study uses Herschel SPIRE spectroscopy to analyze molecular and atomic lines in NGC 6240, revealing shock excitation as the primary mechanism for gas heating, with implications for understanding turbulent gas dynamics in luminous infrared galaxies.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed analysis of shock excitation in NGC 6240 using Herschel SPIRE data, distinguishing shock effects from UV/X-ray irradiation in molecular gas excitation.
Findings
CO to continuum luminosity ratio is significantly higher than in similar galaxies.
Shock models indicate slow shocks dominate most of the gas, with some regions experiencing faster shocks.
High CO line-to-continuum ratio serves as a diagnostic for shock presence.
Abstract
We present Herschel SPIRE FTS spectroscopy of the nearby luminous infrared galaxy NGC 6240. In total 20 lines are detected, including CO J=4-3 through J=13-12, 6 H2O rotational lines, and [CI] and [NII] fine-structure lines. The CO to continuum luminosity ratio is 10 times higher in NGC 6240 than Mrk 231. Although the CO ladders of NGC 6240 and Mrk 231 are very similar, UV and/or X-ray irradiation are unlikely to be responsible for the excitation of the gas in NGC 6240. We applied both C and J shock models to the H2 v=1-0 S(1) and v=2-1 S(1) lines and the CO rotational ladder. The CO ladder is best reproduced by a model with shock velocity v_s=10 km s^-1 and a pre-shock density n_H=5 * 10^4 cm^-3. We find that the solution best fitting the H2 lines is degenerate: The shock velocities and number densities range between v_s = 17 - 47 km s^-1 and n_H=10^7 - 5 * 10^4 cm^-3, respectively.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
