Characterizing two solar-type Kepler subgiants with asteroseismology: KIC10920273 and KIC11395018
G. Dogan, T. S. Metcalfe, S. Deheuvels, M. P. Di Mauro, P., Eggenberger, O. L. Creevey, M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro, M. Pinsonneault, A., Frasca, C. Karoff, S. Mathur, S. G. Sousa, I. M. Brandao, T. L. Campante, R., Handberg, A.O. Thygesen, K. Biazzo, H. Bruntt, E. Niemczura

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler asteroseismology data combined with ground-based spectroscopy to precisely determine the fundamental properties of two evolved solar-type subgiants, revealing their distinct masses and ages and confirming their evolutionary status.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed asteroseismic modeling of two Kepler subgiants, improving the precision of their fundamental parameters and clarifying their evolutionary stages compared to previous estimates.
Findings
KIC10920273 is a 1.00 solar mass, 7.12 Gyr old subgiant.
KIC11395018 is a 1.27 solar mass, 4.57 Gyr old subgiant.
Both stars are evolved subgiants with high lithium abundance, not young stars.
Abstract
Determining fundamental properties of stars through stellar modeling has improved substantially due to recent advances in asteroseismology. Thanks to the unprecedented data quality obtained by space missions, particularly CoRoT and Kepler, invaluable information is extracted from the high-precision stellar oscillation frequencies, which provide very strong constraints on possible stellar models for a given set of classical observations. In this work, we have characterized two relatively faint stars, KIC10920273 and KIC11395018, using oscillation data from Kepler photometry and atmospheric constraints from ground-based spectroscopy. Both stars have very similar atmospheric properties; however, using the individual frequencies extracted from the Kepler data, we have determined quite distinct global properties, with increased precision compared to that of earlier results. We found that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
