Finiteness Properties and Profinite Completions
Alexander Lubotzky

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain geometric and homological finiteness properties of groups are not detectable solely from their profinite completions, by constructing examples of groups with identical profinite completions but different finiteness types.
Contribution
It provides explicit examples of finitely generated residually finite groups with isomorphic profinite completions but differing in their finiteness properties, showing these properties are not profinite invariants.
Findings
Existence of groups with same profinite completion but different finiteness types
Finiteness properties are not profinite properties
Counterexamples for various finiteness conditions
Abstract
In this note we show that various (geometric/homological) finiteness properties are not profinite properties. For example for every , there exist two finitely generated residually finite groups and with isomorphic profinite completions, such that is strictly of type and of type .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Finite Group Theory Research · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
