Magic numbers in the discrete tomography of cyclotomic model sets
Christian Huck

TL;DR
This paper investigates how to distinguish convex subsets of cyclotomic model sets using X-ray techniques, establishing specific 'magic numbers' of directions needed for unique identification in various geometric configurations.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of 'magic numbers' for cyclotomic model sets, providing explicit minimal counts of directions required for convex subset differentiation.
Findings
Existence of a 'magic number' for each model set type
Explicit minimal numbers for pentagonal, octagonal, decagonal, and dodecagonal sets
Progress in discrete tomography of cyclotomic model sets
Abstract
We report recent progress in the problem of distinguishing convex subsets of cyclotomic model sets by (discrete parallel) X-rays in prescribed -directions. It turns out that for any of these model sets there exists a `magic number' such that any two convex subsets of can be distinguished by their X-rays in any set of prescribed -directions. In particular, for pentagonal, octagonal, decagonal and dodecagonal model sets, the least possible numbers are in that very order 11, 9, 11 and 13.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
