No anti-correlation between cyclotron line energy and X-ray flux in 4U 0115+634
Sebastian M\"uller, Carlo Ferrigno, Matthias K\"uhnel, Gabriele, Sch\"onherr, Peter A. Becker, Michael T. Wolff, Dominik Hertel, Fritz-Walter, Schwarm, Victoria Grinberg, Maria Obst, Isabel Caballero, Katja Pottschmidt,, Felix F\"urst, Ingo Kreykenbohm, Richard E. Rothschild

TL;DR
This study reanalyzes the relationship between cyclotron line energy and X-ray flux in 4U 0115+63, demonstrating that previous anti-correlation findings were artifacts of continuum modeling assumptions.
Contribution
It shows that the anti-correlation between cyclotron line energy and flux is due to modeling artifacts, not an intrinsic physical property.
Findings
Anti-correlation previously reported is an artifact of continuum modeling.
Using a different continuum model, the line energy remains constant.
The apparent anti-correlation disappears with improved spectral modeling.
Abstract
We report on an outburst of the high mass X-ray binary 4U 0115+63 with a pulse period of 3.6s in 2008 March/April as observed with RXTE and INTEGRAL. During the outburst the neutron star's luminosity varied by a factor of 10 in the 3--50\,keV band. In agreement with earlier work we find evidence for five cyclotron resonance scattering features at ~10.7, 21.8, 35.5, 46.7, and 59.7keV. Previous work had found an anti-correlation between the fundamental cyclotron line energy and the X-ray flux. We show that this apparent anti-correlation is probably due to the unphysical interplay of parameters of the cyclotron line with the continuum models used previously, e.g., the negative and positive exponent power law (NPEX). For this model, we show that cyclotron line modeling erroneously leads to describing part of the exponential cutoff and the continuum variability, and not the cyclotron lines.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
