Restriction categories as enriched categories
Robin Cockett, Richard Garner

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that restriction categories, which model partially defined mappings, can be understood as enriched categories, unifying various notions like join and range restriction through a suitable enrichment base.
Contribution
It establishes an equivalence between restriction categories and enriched categories, providing a new perspective and tools for studying partial maps using enriched category theory.
Findings
Restriction categories are equivalent to certain enriched categories.
The framework captures join and range restriction categories.
Enriched category theory offers new insights into partial mappings.
Abstract
Restriction categories were introduced to provide an axiomatic setting for the study of partially defined mappings; they are categories equipped with an operation called restriction which assigns to every morphism an endomorphism of its domain, to be thought of as the partial identity that is defined to just the same degree as the original map. In this paper, we show that restriction categories can be identified with \emph{enriched categories} in the sense of Kelly for a suitable enrichment base. By varying that base appropriately, we are also able to capture the notions of join and range restriction category in terms of enriched category theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
