The nature of high-energy radiation damage in iron: Modeling results
Eva Zarkadoula, Martin T. Dove, Szymon L. Daraszewicz, Dorothy M., Duffy, Michael Seaton, Ilian T. Todorov, Kai Nordlund, Kostya Trachenko

TL;DR
This paper uses molecular dynamics simulations to analyze high-energy radiation damage in iron, revealing continuous collision cascades and novel defect clusters, which inform models of material behavior under radiation.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the structure and morphology of radiation-induced damage in iron at high energies, highlighting the transition to continuous cascades and defect clustering.
Findings
Collision cascades become more continuous at high energies
Large defect clusters and small vacancy/interstitial clusters are observed
Results inform physical models of radiation damage in structural materials
Abstract
Understanding and predicting a material's performance in response to high-energy radiation damage, as well as designing future materials to be used in intense radiation environments, requires the knowledge of the structure, morphology and amount of radiation-induced structural change. We report the results of molecular dynamics simulations of high-energy radiation damage in iron in the range 0.2-0.5 MeV. We analyze and quantify the nature of collision cascades both at the global and local scale. We find that the structure of high-energy collision cascades becomes increasingly continuous as opposed to showing sub-cascade branching reported previously. At the local length scale, we find large defect clusters and novel small vacancy and interstitial clusters. These features form the basis for physical models aimed at understanding the effects of high energy radiation damage in structural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
