Quasar emission lines, radio structures and radio unification
Neal Jackson, I.W.A. Browne (University of Manchester, School of, Physics & Astronomy, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This paper examines how observational limitations affect tests of unified models of radio-loud AGN, concluding that relativistic schemes remain compatible with current data despite selection biases.
Contribution
It uses simulations to analyze the impact of resolution and sensitivity limits on the interpretation of radio AGN samples, supporting the validity of relativistic unified schemes.
Findings
Limited resolution affects core source representation.
Sensitivity biases exclude certain source classes.
Core-dominated quasars are optically brighter.
Abstract
Unified schemes of radio sources, which account for different types of radio AGN in terms of anisotropic radio and optical emission, together with different orientations of the ejection axis to the line of sight, have been invoked for many years. Recently, large samples of optical quasars, mainly from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, together with large radio samples, such as FIRST, have become available. These hold the promise of providing more stringent tests of unified schemes but, compared to previous samples, lack high resolution radio maps. Nevertheless they have been used to investigate unified schemes, in some cases yielding results which appear inconsistent with such theories. Here we investigate using simulations how the selection effects to which such investigations are subject can influence the conclusions drawn. In particular, we find that the effects of limited resolution do…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
