Probing the bias of radio sources at high redshift
Sean Passmoor, Catherine Cress, Andreas Faltenbacher, Russell, Johnston, Mathew Smith, Ando Ratsimbazafy, Ben Hoyle

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method to estimate the bias of high-redshift radio sources using angular clustering, photometric redshifts, and simulations, revealing that unmatched sources are likely at higher redshifts.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to probe the bias of radio sources at high redshift without redshift data by combining optical matching, simulations, and angular correlation analysis.
Findings
Unmatched radio sources are predominantly at higher redshifts.
Angular correlation functions can differentiate redshift ranges.
Bias estimates align with dark matter clustering expectations.
Abstract
The relationship between the clustering of dark matter and that of luminous matter is often described using the bias parameter. Here, we provide a new method to probe the bias of intermediate to high-redshift radio continuum sources for which no redshift information is available. We matched radio sources from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty centimetres (FIRST) survey data to their optical counterparts in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to obtain photometric redshifts for the matched radio sources. We then use the publicly available semi-empirical simulation of extragalactic radio continuum sources (S3) to infer the redshift distribution for all FIRST sources and estimate the redshift distribution of unmatched sources by subtracting the matched distribution from the distribution of all sources. We infer that the majority of unmatched sources are at higher redshifts than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
