On the shear estimation bias induced by the spatial variation of colour across galaxy profiles
Elisabetta Semboloni, Henk Hoekstra, Zhuoyi Huang, Vincenzo Cardone,, Mark Cropper, Benjamin Joachimi, Thomas Kitching, Konrad Kuijken, Marco, Lombardi, Roberto Maoli, Yannick Mellier, Lance Miller, Jason Rhodes, Roberto, Scaramella, Tim Schrabback, Malin Velander

TL;DR
This paper investigates how spatial colour variations in galaxies cause shear measurement biases in weak lensing, develops a method to quantify and correct this bias, and demonstrates that existing HST data can effectively mitigate it for Euclid.
Contribution
It introduces a general approach to quantify shear bias from colour variation and shows how to correct it using multi-filter galaxy observations, ensuring Euclid's measurements meet scientific standards.
Findings
Bias is approximately 3×10^-3 for Euclid-like galaxies.
Using HST F606W and F814W filters reduces bias by an order of magnitude.
Archival HST data is sufficient for bias correction in Euclid's analysis.
Abstract
The spatial variation of the colour of a galaxy may introduce a bias in the measurement of its shape if the PSF profile depends on wavelength. We study how this bias depends on the properties of the PSF and the galaxies themselves. The bias depends on the scales used to estimate the shape, which may be used to optimise methods to reduce the bias. Here we develop a general approach to quantify the bias. Although applicable to any weak lensing survey, we focus on the implications for the ESA Euclid mission. Based on our study of synthetic galaxies we find that the bias is a few times 10^-3 for a typical galaxy observed by Euclid. Consequently, it cannot be neglected and needs to be accounted for. We demonstrate how one can do so using spatially resolved observations of galaxies in two filters. We show that HST observations in the F606W and F814W filters allow us to model and reduce the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
