Prospects and Blind Spots for Neutralino Dark Matter
Clifford Cheung, Lawrence J. Hall, David Pinner, and Joshua T., Ruderman

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the detection prospects and limitations for neutralino dark matter within a simplified model, identifying blind spots where experimental constraints are weak and highlighting regions promising for future discovery.
Contribution
It analytically identifies all blind spots in neutralino dark matter detection and assesses experimental reach across diverse supersymmetric models and cosmological scenarios.
Findings
Blind spots occur for specific parameter sign choices among M1, M2, and μ.
Current experiments still allow large viable parameter space.
Upcoming experiments are likely to detect dark matter in much of the remaining space.
Abstract
Using a simplified model framework, we assess observational limits and discovery prospects for neutralino dark matter, taken here to be a general admixture of bino, wino, and Higgsino. Experimental constraints can be weakened or even nullified in regions of parameter space near 1) purity limits, where the dark matter is mostly bino, wino, or Higgsino, or 2) blind spots, where the relevant couplings of dark matter to the or Higgs bosons vanish identically. We analytically identify all blind spots relevant to spin-independent and spin-dependent scattering and show that they arise for diverse choices of relative signs among , , and . At present, XENON100 and IceCube still permit large swaths of viable parameter space, including the well-tempered neutralino. On the other hand, upcoming experiments should have sufficient reach to discover dark matter in much of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
