A two-dimensional $C^{2,1}$ metric with no local $C^2$ embedding in $\mathbb{R}^3$, following Pogorelov
Jonathan Holland

TL;DR
This paper proves Pogorelov's theorem that a specific $C^{2,1}$ metric cannot be locally realized as a $C^2$ surface in $ ^3$, and provides an elementary construction of a $C^{1,1}$ realization, clarifying previous ambiguities.
Contribution
It offers a detailed proof of Pogorelov's non-embeddability result and constructs an explicit $C^{1,1}$ realization, addressing gaps in the original work.
Findings
Existence of a $C^{2,1}$ metric with no local $C^2$ embedding in $ ^3$
Elementary construction of a $C^{1,1}$ realization of this metric
Clarification of Pogorelov's original proof and its details
Abstract
This article presents a proof of Pogorelov's result that there exists a metric with no local realization in . It also construct in a very elementary way a realization of this metric. Pogorelov's result is somewhat controversial among the community of researchers that study isometric immersions. This in part owes to the lack of details in Pogorelov's original paper. The chief aim of the paper is therefore to provide the missing details. The construction is the same as Pogorelov's, although the verification differs in some important respects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
