Response to the comment of K.W. Edmonds et al. on the article 'Controlling the Curie temperature in (Ga,Mn)As through location of the Fermi level within the impurity band'
M. Dobrowolska, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, M. Berciu, K. M. Yu, W., Walukiewicz

TL;DR
This paper responds to a comment on their previous work about controlling the Curie temperature in (Ga,Mn)As, emphasizing the importance of Fermi level positioning within the impurity band in thin films.
Contribution
It clarifies and defends the original findings on Fermi level control of Curie temperature in (Ga,Mn)As against criticisms.
Findings
Highlights the significance of Fermi level placement within the impurity band
Reinforces the role of impurity band in ferromagnetic properties
Underscores the importance of thin film properties
Abstract
Although we seriously disagree with many of the points raised in the comment by Edmonds et al., we feel that it is valuable and timely, since comparison of this comment and our paper serves to underscore an important property of the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As in thin film form.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
